Production Logo 2009

Comment by Chig on August 15, 2009 at 7:29pm

Ah very dramatic... however for added dramatic effect I would replace the explosion with a fart noise and change the music to "Feelings".

Comment by NatureJunkie on August 16, 2009 at 12:45am

Okay, this is very impressive. But in referring to your old logo, you mean that little four-image animation of your portrait? I LOVED that thing. If you don't want it anymore, can I have it?

Comment by BlancheNoE on August 16, 2009 at 1:02am

I gotta' agree with Nature. I wouldn't mess with Nature if I were you Peter. She's all hopped up on flowers and birds and spring fed streams. Junkies are capable of freak strength, man. You just don't know WHAT she'll do. I'll tell you what, give ME the logo and I'll make sure it gets directly to NatureJunkie so we can avoid a whole Katrina type thing 'kay? * thinks to self : wonder how much she'll pay for it *
The classic (original) is gold Peter. I vote for non-retirement. I FEAR CHANGE ! *coughs - straightens jacket - spits*

Comment by NatureJunkie on August 16, 2009 at 1:10am

I'll trade a six-pack of premium beer for it. I'll even throw in a bottle of Jägermeister that I have hardly sipped from.

Comment by SydTheSkeptic on August 16, 2009 at 1:19am

I love both!!!

So this would be the lead-in and your other is the closer, right?

Comment by SydTheSkeptic on August 16, 2009 at 1:19am

Oh, heh- just read the text. Still love it.

Comment by Jim on August 16, 2009 at 4:28am

I also love both, Peter. The old one is personal, and has a grainy, beat generation feel to it. The new one is impressive and high-tech, using effects that you are famous for. Perhaps you could give the old one a rest, but not retire it completely?

Comment by luvdabun on August 16, 2009 at 10:46am

I can remember the first time your pic moved. It was like wow and errie and fun and soooo dramatic. Now this one is nice, grant that. High tech and such. Bun says hmm she adores seeing your mug spin...

Comment by LtAdams2247 on August 16, 2009 at 11:22am

Hmm. I didn't know feelings were leaning that strong towards the old one. I actually wanted to change it for some time but I knew Blanch liked it so I waited till after The Vault for the transition. Now there's definitely gonna be projects where the low tech logo won't fit anymore. But I'll go with the diplomatic proposal of Jim (who should be elected as Ark Ambassador) and keep it for the smaller ones. Deal? Just don't send nature after me ;-)
Another I wanted to clarify in case more people have seen this and were just too polite to say anything (wich just goes to show what an amazing bunch y'all are ;-) ). Somebody noticed a spelling error in here, saying it should be "A LtAdams2247 Production". That's been pointed out to me before and I'm beginning to think that's one of those cultural differences. Appearently, when the American sees the abbreviation "Lt" the word spells out completely in his head, naturally making it "a lieutenant adams production". The German mind however does translate abbreviations into it's component letters. Like all the time. This makes it "an el tee adams production". Does this make any sence, linguistically?

Comment by LtAdams2247 on August 16, 2009 at 12:04pm

I've seen you rant, rams, you're not fooling anyone ;-)

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page